In the 1940s thrillers, criminal impulses are generally motivated in terms of personal malaise or psychic dysfunction. Any social critique is avoided… at least on the surface.
There were in fact a few characteristics in these films that suggest the hero’s personal experience is actually the figuration of a larger social issue.
Most of these stories are concerned with crime, very often murder. While in previous years crime had been seen as something ‘other’, something ‘outside’ that needs to be controlled, in film noir crime gets very close. The hero himself becomes – willingly or by accident – the criminal, which cause a shift in the way the crime is handled: because the criminal is also the hero, the story delves sometimes very deep in the reasons and especially in the consequences, both psychological and material, of the crime.
The inadequacy of the hero as a mover of events becomes central as he get pushed to the crime from many directions.
From the outside, the opportunity is provided by a woman, who first and foremost induces the hero toward an ‘alternative’ world, a transgression that promises to give a new sense to life and, sometimes, a totally new material life. And killing is the ultimate form of transgression.
On the inside, there’s a sense that the action is moved not by the hero’s will, but by some darker, inner impulse inside himself. Even when he decides to go along with the criminal plan, he is very seldom in control of the action, in spite of his every efforts.
In this sense, film noir concerns the disconnection and the confusion of a hero who has lost his centre in the world. It all comes down to his fears and his insecurities and the ways he tries to re-conquer his central place in the world. Which, if it is indeed a personal story, it nonetheless reflects a social issue.
The sense of subject drama is very strong and intensified by the narrational strategies found within these films. Film noir uses in particular two techniques to suggest the hero’s confusion and his position of insecurity:In 1940s #FilmNoir the hero becomes the criminal and the story is all about his reasons… Click To Tweet
This is a common narrative tool in film noir, and while it offers the usual possibility (characteristics of the technique) to fill the viewer in about events which happened before the film started, it also fragmentises the narration. Some films, like The Killers, are built around a very complex structure of flashbacks that shifts point-of-views (and so gives an ununified view of the story) and breaks the narration, forcing the viewer to piece the story together on their own, without an authorative guidance. This reflects the hero’s awkwardness in piecing together the world around him.
This is one of the chief characteristics of film noir and one of the places where the divided identity of the hero becomes more apparent. While on the screen, in the flow of the action we see the image of self-confidence and competency the hero gives to the world (since that’s what society expects from him), in the voice over narration he speaks his true heart, his fears and insecurities. In this way the voice over gives us a more complex, more complete and more secret image of the hero.
Detour (1945) by Edgar G. Ulmer
In New York, piano player Al Roberts (Tom Neal) laments when his singer girlfriend, Sue Harvey (Claudia Drake), leaves for Hollywood, Calif. When Al gets some money, he decides to hitchhike to California to join Sue. In Arizona, Al accepts a ride with Charles Haskell (Edmund MacDonald), but during a storm in a freak accident, Haskell is killed. Frightened, Al assumes Haskell’s identity and car, but soon comes upon the mysterious Vera (Ann Savage), who seems to know all about his true identity. (Google synopsis)
READ MORE ABOUT IT
Krutnik, Frank, In a Lonely Street. Routledge, 1991, London/NYC
Sillage Critiques – Flashbacks in film noir