Over the whole XIX century, the Western World in its entirety had been moving in the same direction: away from the countryside into the cities. Away from a rural lifestyle into industrialization and generally into a more inclusive, if maybe more lonely society. Germany had been inside that general flow.
The great shift, which had started in the XIX century with the Industrial Revolution, quickened its pace after the war. Although German society, like all other European societies, remained mostly rural, the move from the countryside to the cities accelerated. And it wasn’t just a move from one place to another, it didn’t’ just change people’s lifestyle, but also their minds. The way people understood life and the ideas they were willing to accept change dramatically as they moved from one environment to the other.
The divide between village and city was possibly at its highest at this time. Life still flew as it had for the past hundred years in the villages, but in the cities, huge social changes were happening. The shifting role of women was one of the most shocking. Women had to fend off for themselves during the war time. They had worked like men, looked after their own family without the help of a man. The republic was giving them new rights, new freedom and to some extent, new power. Women started to think about themselves in a different way and to have different expectations on life. The new contraception methods, which were becoming more common and more commonly accepted, enabled them to greater control over their maternal life, which caused a huge changed inside the family, its structure and its life. Couples could decide when they wanted children and how many they wanted. Family – at least in the cities – became smaller. Many women chose to have children later in life or to have none at all, which, in a time of demographical depression, considered unpatriotic. But more shockingly still, now women could decide to do with their sexual life whatever they wanted, just like men had been doing.
Cities also offer a lot more opportunities than the villages ever had. The old path that led the young on the same working and aspirational life of their fathers was breaking. Educational opportunities in the city meant a young person might become whoever they wanted. And often they did want new opportunities. As their expectation of the future shifted, young people sought new jobs and a new way of life, creating one more fracture with the older generation. There was a strong sense that youths were revolting against their elders about everything: ways of life, aspirations, expectations, values, social behaviour.
Besides, this world was slowly filtering into the countryside as well. Not all who worked in the cities left permanently. Many went back to their villages at the end of the day or the working week bringing with them ideas, attitudes and aspirations from the cities. Women working in domestic positions were instrumental in this shift since they were numerous, and their role in the education of the family was very relevant.
Radio, theatre and itinerant cinemas were becoming commonplace, propagating the new ways of life even in faraway places.
But it would be wrong to think this was happening in a general consensus. Despite everything, the old ‘Wilhelmin’ ideals of property and rigidity were still prevalent and accepted in Germany. Women were more affected. The perceived decadence of the entertainment and the arts was also very strong. There was a general feeling that the world was becoming corrupt. Especially in the cities, this dichotomy between the very new and the very old became extremely sharp.
RESOURCES
Enzo Travero, A ferro e fuoco. La guerra civile europea (1914-1945), Il Mulino, Bologna, 2008
Walter Laqueur, Weimar, A Cultural History 1918-1933. Weidenfeld and Nicolson Ltd. London, 1971
Gunther Mai, Die Weimarer Republik, C.H. Beck Verlag, Munchen, 2009







10 Comments
My grandparents grew up in Berlin in the 1920s. I enjoyed the video. Their grandparents had come from small towns and villages in Prussia. It is always interesting to think of the big trends and the individual experiences
Regards
Anne
Fellow A to Z-er
https://ayfamilyhistory.com/2018/04/18/p-is-for-penelope/
True. As a writer of historically set stories, that’s the aspect I like the most about research 🙂
I think that dichotomy between cities and smaller towns is fascinating. And it’s not in the least surprising that it was such a powerful force during these years. The latest machinery, art/music/dance/film/etc. movements, and so much more, were in the city, and those developments came so fast. It’s little wonder there was a reaction against them.
Yes, it wasn’t surprising. And to some extend, this reminds me of the way social media and the internet is seen today. Our ways of life and relate to reality is also changing incredibly fast. This is one of the things that most connect us to the Twenties, as far as I’m concenred.
I’m writing about people in Montgomery, AL during 1917-1920 and reading today made me wonder where a person in the USA would have had to go to encounter that sort of life. New York came to mind. I think my grandparents would have been shocked to encounter some of the things you’ve covered. But then, maybe I’m just thinking of them as my grandparents and they wouldn’t have been.
LOL! Kristin, that last one is an intersting consideration!!!
Yeah, I’ve read more than once that Berlin could have been likened to New York at the time, even more so than Paris or London.
I thought for sure I left a post here..oh well, my grandparents had 4 kids in the 1920s and lived in the town of Wittenberg before moving to the village of Zornigall about 5km or so from Wittenberg. My Oma’s parents owned a farm near Zornigall and my mom had very sweet memories of her time there. They were so far away from the antics of Berlin even though Berlin was an hour away by train.
My understanding is that Berlin could have been on the moon, as far as countriside people were concerned 😉
I wonder how this shift from rural to urban did not make for a more liberal democracy? Germany certainly reacted badly, and now the U.S. is doing the same.
I think the main problem was that the new life in the city was unsettling all ways of life as people were accustomed to live, and this created uncertainty of the future. Which then morphed into fear… and that’s where problems begun…
Add Comment